Wednesday, May 2, 2007
But what would be the ruling on a peel?
1L: Just because child porn is virtual doesn't mean it's protected by the First Amendment.
Con Law Prof: But children must be used in its production for it to be illegal.
1L: Couldn't the Court consider some virtual child porn to have used a child in the production?
Con Law Prof: I'm not sure I see where you're going with this...
1L: Well, you know how they wire people up and have them move around when they make video games, like Tiger Woods Golf?
Con Law Prof: Oh, I see what you're getting at--kind of like, "here you go, Billy--eat this banana?"