Wednesday, May 2, 2007

But what would be the ruling on a peel?

1L: Just because child porn is virtual doesn't mean it's protected by the First Amendment.

Con Law Prof: But children must be used in its production for it to be illegal.

1L: Couldn't the Court consider some virtual child porn to have used a child in the production?

Con Law Prof: I'm not sure I see where you're going with this...

1L: Well, you know how they wire people up and have them move around when they make video games, like Tiger Woods Golf?

Con Law Prof: Oh, I see what you're getting at--kind of like, "here you go, Billy--eat this banana?"


Scotch and Sandwiches said...

Reminds me of those chicks who were looking at me real funny this one time when I was in a bar trying to lick the last few drops of scotch out of a bottle. At first, I just figured they thought I was a sad, pathetic alcoholic, but then I thought about it some more, and then it hit me... too bad though, that by the time I figured out what was going on, they'd all hooked up with each other.

Justice Moustache said...

I'm a little dejected that nobody complemented me on the pun that is the title of this entry. I was really proud of that.